2–3–5
A historical pyramid with two defenders, three half-backs and five forwards. Historical roles differ from today’s positions; this is not the same as a modern 2–3–5 attacking shape.
Explore formation ↗A starting structure. Roles and positioning change between phases of play.
A historical pyramid with two defenders, three half-backs and five forwards. Historical roles differ from today’s positions; this is not the same as a modern 2–3–5 attacking shape.
Explore formation ↗A historical structure with three defenders, two half-backs, two inside forwards and three higher attackers. Associated with the tactical adaptation of the interwar era.
Explore formation ↗Two defensive lines of four with two forwards. Can form a compact block or support direct attacks; its behaviour depends on distances and roles.
Explore formation ↗A back four, midfield three and front three. Wide attackers and staggered midfield positions can connect width with central play.
Explore formation ↗A double pivot behind three supporting attackers and one striker. The two deeper players share build-up and defensive responsibilities.
Explore formation ↗Three centre-backs, wing-backs, three central midfielders and two forwards. Wing-backs can drop to create a back five.
Explore formation ↗A back five with a narrow midfield three and two forwards. Commonly a defensive phase of a three-centre-back structure, not a promise to defend deep at all times.
Explore formation ↗Five defenders and four midfielders behind one forward. Can protect width and central space while leaving a single outlet for transitions.
Explore formation ↗One holding midfielder sits between the back four and a line of four midfielders. Often related to the defensive organisation of a 4–3–3.
Explore formation ↗Three centre-backs, two central midfielders, wing-backs and three attackers. Can occupy several attacking channels and defend with five at the back.
Explore formation ↗A holding midfielder, two shuttlers and a No. 10 create a diamond behind two forwards. Width often comes from full-backs or players drifting out.
Explore formation ↗A 4–3–3 interpretation in which the central forward drops between the lines. The false nine is a role within the shape, not a wholly separate formation.
Explore formation ↗